Much of the success of the right in the last election was attributed to its superpower to capitalize on so-called family issues. Now partly let out of the mistaken belief that the real issues are economic and that ? shade of life? issues are secondary, progressives have pretty much ceded to conservatives this political terrain. ?Au progressives need do, the thinking goes, is sit back and require for the collapse of President Reagan?s economic program. Many? progressives withal suspect that pro-family programs are a Trojan horse for the revitalization of patriarch. These fears are particularly acute among people in their 20s and earlyish 30s and among feminists, who know that charges of being antifamily have always been used as a rallying cry against their programs. These fears are legitimate. Yet thither is a growing interest in family issues among both middle-income working people and many 1960s activists who are now confronting the problems of fosterage children-and it has zilch to do with a renewed commitment to the tralatitious patriarchal family.
Large numbers of single mothers who have no yearning to return to oppressive, male-dominated relationships also ensure themselves as pro-family. For them, as for many other Americans, the word ?family? has a broad convey: an institution dedicated to nurturing its members and rearing the next generation.
These people see the family as a refuge from a dog-eat-dog society-a haven where fuck and commitment can take precedence over nigh petition and struggle. Because the right appears to be the only pro-family voice in American society, many of its economic and social programs that have nothing to do with family life have won widespread support. only if even if Reaganomics fails to produce economic miracles, and even if stagflation and unemployment increase, the appeal to family set may continue to strike a responsive harmonize among...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment