A loud gunshot noise re male childates through the Keller carry on. As he pulled the trigger ending his worthless living, the drama and the argu custodyts wither forward. The house by the rachisy beach remains quiet as the mist over approaches. The colonel lies on the bed dressed up for his experience funeral. His concepts slip away as he lay breathless. nonwithstanding the different endings, both of these stories sh argon a particular coincidence in the way egotistical people tend to reckon of themselves over other(a)s. We can inspect the nature of tragedy, by examining underlying char enactmenter relations, guilt within the characters, the element of denigrateion and constituent that is prevalent in these stories.
One of the similarities that I discovered stems from the nature of tragedy between characters. As I contemplated the significance of the arrive at/ boy relationships, the similarity jumped pop divulge at me unexpectedly. It inferms like the substitution deaths in these plays are indirect and between the father and son. They are fueled by guilt and emotional investment by both parties as they lead to each other?s demise. The indirect natures of these murders are quite intriguing; it is difficult to introduce who initiated this sequence of deaths. Upon first inspection it seemed to me that the father slays the son in ? wholly my sons? composition the Son slays the Father in ? mark of sand and fog?. This reversal of roles seemed very interesting to me. On paper, this is what it reads like: The father in ? any my sons? sold defective cylinder heads that cost the runs of soldiers, upon hearing this, the son couldn?t live with himself, committing suicide. Upon recognition of this misfortune the father takes his declare life at his house. The father in ?house of sand and fog? bought a house that was not rightful(prenominal)ly his, the rightful owner and her caramel started fighting back for it which ended up with the murder of the son by the police, who was standing up to defend himself and his dad. The completely situation that we can say for certain is that one sold and the other bought; personal gain was the motivation. What these fathers didn?t know was that these transactions would go intimately their own collapse. I started digging deeper as was not yet satisfied with my initial verdict; I thought I was onto something as I analyzed the howeverts leading up to the deaths. I believe in that location?s almost a philosophical paradox in the nature of tragedy. One must keep in mind that the natures of these deaths are very intricate. in that location is a blurry line between suicide and murder, and there are a few questions that must be answered originally one knows for sure; is it safe to assume that a public driven to suicide by another man is an act of murder? Or is the so called ?murder? determined by the man?s poor decisions that sow the emotional seeds of self-guilt, self-hate, suicide inside the person that result in his own suicide. It may even be neither of these. From the perspective of civil justice of nature these questions are irrelevant as the law dictates that the son from ?all my sons? is MIA, the father an innocent man who lost his son to the contend effort, his partner Steve a guilty man. In ?house of sand and fog? the father a suicidal victim, the son a victim to a crossfire shooting, and Lester an incompetent deputy who harassed the rightful owner of the house and is now jailed.I believe that the average law system is not suitable for these questions, as it is usually the chemise in real life examples. Even though it does the trump job it can, the sad right is that it puts an abstract label on incidents that are much too complex. The answer to this paradox is debatable. Although this education may be irrelevant to the real truth; the truth about the initial downward spiral in these tragedies.
Joe Keller did pull back one son, but not to the war effort, but to his own war with morality. The internal quarrel that he chose to forget. He knowingly shipped faulty parts due to the pressure to meet the despatch date. He claims it was necessary to keep the military contract, has resulted in the handout of his son, as well as the sons of other families. Through out the story he tries to reinforce his belief that he is lawful. ?Because its true(p) money, theres nothing wrong with that money. (trying to convince both himself and Chris)? (125) Joe exclaimed. ?Your brothers alive, darling, because if hes dead, your father killed him.? ?He never flew a P-40, whats the matter with you? (trying to absolve his guilt)? ?: Dad... Dad, you killed twenty-one men!?(156) Chris cried out. Larry ended up sacrificing himself for his father?s sins as short as he heard what he did. He could not bear to live with the idea of his fathers flawed, immoral behavior. Behrani lived a unsafe life as he escaped homeland to evacuate conflict. He was also the type of man who would look out for the well being of his family, but was also very arrogant. His gravitas stemmed from the fact that he wanted power in his family and would not take anyone elses opinion into consideration. ?tomorrow you go forth start out packing, and there?s no more to discuss.? Behrani barks the order at his wife. He was blinded by the hope that he could see into infinity, like the gods, even before he moved to America. ?to scope infinity with our eyes, to see forever? exclaimed behrani. This hunger for power make him buy a house that he later build out was not rightfully sold. Despite this, his motivation for lettuce was too great to sell the house at even the original price back to the rightful owner. His son looked up to his father and eventually stood up for his beliefs.
He could not bear to see his father ?mistreated? and decided to defend him, make his life to come to a tragic end. Only when his son was shot did he realize the wrongfulness in his actions. ? cheer god, don?t take my joon-am. I will give everything to one who is less fortunate? he shouted, praying to the gods. Honesty only comes out of ones guilty conscience when it benefits them.
Fate had dictated the succeeding(a) for both of these families. Both the sons ended up giving away their lives because of their father?s actions. One, because he looked up to his father; while the other because he looked down upon his father in shame. Those are the facts, and my personal opinion is that both of the fathers are the ones that are responsible for the devastation that ensued. That is the real truth behind these tragedies. Even though there are plenty of side stories which all added up to the epic conflic I think that the fathers were the ones that sparked the fuse. Both of these stories criticize the round-shouldered nature of our society. It seems like the business world is now a place of selfishness, where people care too much about themselves; that which benefits them, and will go to any lengths to achieve that goal. Even if the repercussions of their actions will bring harm to other people. It seems apparent that society in general values money and profit more than pieces life. In both ?All my sons? and ?house of sand and fog? money seems to be the key factor that drives the fathers to this level of corruption, in turn unfolding their tragic fate. Joe Keller knowingly operated his company maliciously, to prevent his business from going bankrupt, claiming that he did it for his family. As well as Behrani abusing the circumstances by stealing from the misfortunate to propel himself and his family to a higher class.
The question of who truly is blameworthy is obvious upon surrounding(prenominal) inspection. Whether it was suicide or murder, the real tragedy lies within the minds of corrupt individuals willing to sacrifice all for personal profit. These stories make it transcend that money, dishonesty, and selfishness take precedence over friendship and human life in corrupt individuals, and that fate takes over and punishes them eventually. The reoccurring theme of guilt, gain, innocence, and dismissal are prevalent in these stories. The characters and scenarios are the only things that differ. hopefully we learn from these stories and act upon the people who are destroying the basic human values of goodwill and honesty.
Works CitedHouse of Sand and Fog. Dir. Vadim Perelman. Perf. Jennifer Connelly, Ben Kingsley. DreamWorks Distribution LCC, 2003. DVD.
Miller, Arthur. All My Sons. Print.
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment