Immanuel Kant S Moral Theory Essay

Although Kants object lesson theory removes many great points ab step forward fair play and equality, the negatives of the theory knocked out(p)weigh the positives. Kants moral theory would neer be able to function in todays society. His theory is establish solely on forever and a day fulfilling your moral duty. Which would be impossible since erstwhile someone told a lie or showed emotion every function would f completely apart. payable to the fact that everyone wouldnt trust anyone anymore which wouldnt end up well. Deontology is defined as the theory of duty.Kants moral theory quarter be categorized as a deontological theory, due to his belief that you feel a moral duty to fulfill (Kant 114). Kant believes that all people need intrinsic or inherent value. Which in simple terms nasty that we as human beings are held to a higher standard to cope what is right and wrong (Kant 114). Kant states that there are except two principles for an serve to be morally right. Fi rst, you must have done the action out of the motivation of good go away. Kant defines good lead as To act out of duty, out of a concern and respect for the moral law(Kant 114). good will plays a very important role on assessing the moral worth of an action.Kant explains that you cant just have good will for an action but also you must do the right thing. So without good will you couldnt determine any action morally right. The instant principle is that the action must conform to moral law. If you come these two Blezien 3 principles the outcome being good or distressing is non your responsibility (Kant 113). Moral law is universal and is determined by plane imperatives. The workout of categorical imperatives plays a big role in Kants overall moral theory. The first categorical imperative training is Act only on that maxim that you can will as a universal law (Kant 116).This categorical imperative applies to everyone and focuses on your belief process before you act on som ething. You must ask yourself is what Im about to do something I can approve of former(a)s doing on the regular? If you cant approve of others committing the same act wherefore your action wouldnt pass the categorical imperative test. Kants second formulation is Always treat humanity, whether in your own person or that of another, never simply as a means but always at the same metre as an end (Kant 117). The second categorical imperative applies to your individual self and everyone else.This imperative focuses on how you should always grant everyones value and existence. There is never a cadence where you should use someone or let someone use you. My first time reading about Kants moral theory I aspect there were only weaknesses. After I spent more time analyzing the theory, I found that there are both intensitys and weaknesses. A strength that I found was how Kant really expressed that everyone is to be treated equally. Kant says that since all humans are rational beings tha t we are all capable of respecting others.This is a strength because with everyone using their moral obligation to treat each other equally things would be a lot easier. People would not only consider themselves before acting on something but they would have to make sure they are Blezien 3 considering the moral thing to do. If this idea of equality were universal and followed by everyone there would be a lot less(prenominal) violence, depression, and racial tension. Which would leave everyone overall satisfied since everybody is following the moral law. A critical weakness I found in Kants moral theory is that he says there is a right and wrong for everything.This is a weakness because there are many examples where using good will isnt the best answer. For example when I read that Kant suggested that if a orca comes to your house and asked where your friend is to kill him you must tell the truth. That seems a smaller extreme and I have to disagree that would be the best thing to d o. Your emotions would sure be going crazy which already makes your answer morally wrong according to Kant. He needs to know where to draw the demarcation and shouldnt be only on one side.In this musical theme I have described the basic principles of Kants moral theory. I have learned that without having a good will you can never be morally right according to Kant. His categorical imperatives show a lot of fairness and equality, but when it comes down something simple like deceitfulness to someone who wants to kill your friend to save your friends life youre not morally correct. Overall, Kants moral theory was very interesting to watch how philosophers thought back then. I wonder what Kant would think if he knew how practically we let our emotions affect our decisions.