E. M. Forster’s “A Passage to India” Essay

The chief argument against imperialism in E. M. Forsters A Passage to India is that it prevents personal relationships. The central question of the novel is present at the very beginning when Mahmoud Ali and Hamidullah ask each other whether or no it is possible to be friends with an Englishman. The answer, given by Forster himself on the wear page, is No, not yet No, not there. Such friendship is made impossible, on a political level, by the existence of the British Raj. While having some(prenominal) important drawbacks, Forsters anti-imperial argument has the advantage of being concrete, clear, moving, and presumably persuasive. It is to a fault particularly well-suited to pursuit in the novel form, which tradition every(prenominal)y has focused on interactions among individuals.Forster does much more in his bookthan simply deride the bigotry of a few accidental individuals. He carefully shows how this intolerance turn ups from the poor power relationship between English and I ndians, from the imperialistic relationship itself The serve up is best shown in the book in the case of Ronny, who has only of late come out from England to be City Magistrate of Chandrapore.Ronny was at basic kindly towards the Indians, but he soon found that his position prevented such friendship. in brief after his arrival he invited the lawyer Mahmoud All to construct a smoke with him, only to learn later that clients began flocking to Ali in the belief that he had an in with the Magistrate. Ronny subsequently dropped on him in Court as embarrassing as I could. Its taught me a lesson, and I hope him. In this instance, it is clearly Ronnys official position rather than any front defect of the heart which disrupts the say-so friendship. And it is his position in the imperial mental synthesis which causes his later defect, his lack of true regret when he tells his meet that immediately I prefer my smoke at the club amongst my own sort, Im afraid.Forster tells us that every human act in the eastern hemisphere is tainted with officialism and that where there is officialism every human relationship suffers. People cannot make believe a friendship of equals when the Raj is based on an inequality of powerThe single possible exception to this process of corruption among Englishmen is handle. He is partially tolerant to the influence of the imperialistic power relationship because he works in education rather than government, and because, as he puts it, he travels lighthe has no hostages to fortune. handle establishes a friendship with Aziz and maintains it in defiance of all the other Anglo-Indians. There is some doubt, however, whether he can maintain this telephone circuit and still remain in imperial India. He is obliged to digress the Club and says he will leave India altogether should Aziz be convicted. after Fielding marries Stella, thereby ceasing to travel light, and after he arrests associated with the government as a school inspecto r, he undergoes a marked change of emplacement toward the Raj. It would surely be a mistake to continue, as several critics do, to identify Forster with Fielding past this point.The omniscient narrator pulls back and summarizes Fieldings situation He had thrown in his lot with Anglo-India by marrying a countrywoman, and he was acquiring some of its limitations. Like Ronny and the other English officials, Fielding begins to be corrupted by his position. Thinking of how Godboles school has degenerated into a granary, the new school inspector asserts that Indians go to seed at at once away from the British. Fielding almost exactly echoes Ronnys defense of the Raj to his mother when he excuses unpleasantness in the supposedly necessary imperial presence he had no further use for politeness, he said, meaning that the British pudding stone really cant be abolished because its rude. Fielding surely did not start with a defect of the heart, but, as a result of his new position in the i mperial structure, he is acquiring one.The English, of course, arent the only ones corrupted by imperialism. Although most of the Indians in the book have a nearly unbelievable desire to befriend Englishmen, they are in conclusion turned from it by the political reality. Some succumb to self-interest. Mahmoud Ali, for example, seems to have been the first to subvert his budding friendship with Ronny by advertising their smoke to potential litigants. More often the Indians succumb to the fear, largely justified but on occasion erroneous, that they will be scorned and betrayed. The prime example is Aziz.He makes the majestic mistake of assuming that Fielding back in England has married his opponent Adela and further that Fielding had urged him not to press impose on _or_ oppresss against his false accuser so Fielding himself could enjoy Adelas money. Aziz, of course, has been conditioned to expect betrayal from his experience with other Anglo-Indians, and this expectation provides an undercurrent to the friendship from the very beginning. After Fielding returns to India, and Aziz learns he really married Stella Moore, their relationship is partially retrieved, but the damage has been done. The new school inspector has shifted toward the Raj, and Aziz, now leery of all Englishmen, has become a nationalist, saying of India, Not until she is a nation will her sons be treated with respect.