'Similarities and Differences in Sociological Theories of Crime\r'

'sociological theories of venomous offence contain a great deal of service fit information in the understanding of criminal conduct. sociological theories atomic number 18 very useful in the con of criminal behaviour because unlike psychological and biologic theories they are mostly macro train theories which adjudicate to sageise rates of plague for a root word or an area rather than explaining why an separate committed a curse. (Kubrin, 2012). There is however about micro level sociological theories of criminal offence that attempts to explain the individual’s motivation for criminal bearing (Kubrin, 2012).\r\nOf the contemporary sociological theories there are tierce which come to the forefront and which we get out examine, affable appointment guess, amicable disarrangement theory, and sensible choice theory. tender Conflict Theory As the name suggests, favorable conflict theory is a conflict ground perspective. Conflict based perspectives asse rt that laws that govern what behaviors are criminal and what are not come from a conflict between those in power and those who aren’t (Kubrin, 2012).\r\nSocial conflict theory basically says that disgust is born(p) out of this conflict between those that flip power inside a society and those that go in’t. Those that have the power in a society are the ones that make the laws and indeed make laws which will benefit them and forward their goals and ideals often at the cost of those without power. It is this conflict and the consequenceing laws regulating what is criminal and what is not that is in conclusion the cause of detestation. Social Disorganization Theory unconnected fond conflict theory, social disorganisation theory is based on the consensus perspective.\r\nThe consensus perspective believes that laws are born out of a consensus of members of a society seek order indoors that society (Kubrin, 2012). Social disorganisation theory views crime as a result of a breakdown of organization and grow within a society (Warner, 2003). This breakdown of organization and culture within a community leads to a miss of informal social control which in exhaust leads to higher crime rates especially in the juvenile population (Simons, Simons, Burt, Brody, & Cutrona, 2005).\r\nSocial disorganization theory asserts that strong levels of connection within a community along with a sense of civic pride motivate individuals to take a much active role in the community therefore acting as a deterrent to crime. judicious Choice Theory The third of the contemporary sociological theories is rational choice theory. In stark descent to social conflict theory and social disorganization theory which are macro level theories, rational choice theory is a micro level theory (Kubrin, 2012). Rational choice theory centrees on the individual motivation behind criminal behavior.\r\nspecifically the idea that the choice to commit criminal behavior is a choice based on a type of risk reward scenario. The person contemplating a criminal act consciously weighs the risk associated with the crime against the reward they stand to gain from the crime. Similarities and Differences Each of these deuce-ace contemporary sociological theories of crime are homogeneous in that they focus mainly on crime in poor or disadvantaged areas. This focus is obvious with social conflict theory and social disorganization theory but not as much with rational choice theory although it is there.\r\nWith rational choice theory the concept of what is to be gained from the criminal activity in itself implies that the person is most probably poor or disadvantaged in approximately way necessitating crime to obtain the things they need or desire. Where these theories differ is their basic concepts of what the actual cause of crime is. Where social conflict theory and social disorganization theory view the causes of crime on a group level, rational choice th eory says that crime is caused on an individual level.\r\nLikewise, on an even more(prenominal) fundamental level, social conflict theory and social disorganization theory differ in that social conflict theory believes laws regulating criminal behavior are formed out of conflict within a society where social disorganization theory believes laws are formed from a consensus within society. Conclusions sociological theories of crime are very useful, especially in the prediction and prevention of crime. One of their greatest strengths is their ability to explain crime within a original group or community.\r\nHowever, the fact that the group or area they most often focus on is poor or disadvantages is one of their greatest weaknesses. Sociological theories fail to account for so called white stoppage crimes and other types of crimes that occur mainly among more pissed individuals and in more well off neighborhoods. As with psychological and biological theories, sociological theories have their strengths and weaknesses. To very understand the nature and causes of crime and to be able to prevent it will take an understanding and mix of many different theories.\r\n'