Hgfds

BOND ENTHALPY make: to determine the henry trade of the chemical reply: Zn+CuSo4ZnSo4+Cu Variables: Independent: no conglomerate bag Dependent: change in temperature and time Control: amount of CuSo4 and Zn  Raw information: Amounts of Reactants: 25cm cubed of CuSo4 and 5g of Zn Uncertainties: cock: 25.00_+ 0.06 Thermometer: temperature _+0.5 Balance: 6.00_+0.01 Data hoard: Time(s)| Temp test 1 stop Celsius | Temp rivulet 2 degree celsius| total | 0| 24| 23| 23.5| 0.5| 24| 23| 23.5| 1| 24| 24| 24| 1.5| 24| 24| 24| 2| 24| 24| 24| 2.5| 24| 24| 24| 3| dig up added| Zinc added| Zinc added| 3.5| 42| 36| 39| 4| 49| 47| 48| 4.5| 50| 49| 49.5| 5| 49| 49| 49| 5.5| 48| 48| 48| 6| 47| 47| 47.5| 6.5| 47| 47| 47| 7| 47| 46| 46.5| 7.5| 46| 46| 46| 8| 46| 45| 45.5| 8.5| 45| 45| 45| 9| 45| 45| 45| Observations: * There was fizz between the reaction of Zn+CuSo4 * The temperature increased at a rapid upper guff once zinc was added to the squealer sulfate Data uphold: 51.5 51.5 Temp celsius Temp celsius Time(s) Time(s) median(a) Bond hydrogen MCdeltaT 25*4.18*27.5 =2821.5 kJ jetty   Percentage Error: 202-113/4.

5*100 =48% Percentage Uncertainty: 3.8%   hold back for enthalpy change: 0.025 breakwateres = 2821.5J - I breakwatere = ? 2821.5/0.025=112860 =-113KJ Conclusion: the enthalpy change found for the reaction of: Zn+CuSo4ZnSo4+Cu is -113KJ mol but the excepted value was -217KJ mol this is because there was an enormous helping error of 48%. Assumptions: first given: all passionateness is not lost 2nd assumption: that 250cm cubed = 250gr  Evaluation: * Heat take out from lid (secure lid) * Zinc and skunk of zinc * Volume of horseshit sulphate and assume point had a density of 1 ( calculate dencity) * Heat asleep(p) to thermometer * Thermometer not always submerge in copper sulphate (add more...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper