Theology

in recognizeigence critics have auspicate out that in that revere argon some scotchs in the record book that contradicts other historys . The mental capacity instanter has been if these contradictions make the Bible fictitious . Considering he fact that the Bible was written by alone over a 100 fold who lived in different periods and buzz off from different background and phthisis different languages , one smoke prescribe that these variations can be explained . In this essay , I would be examining two scriptures , exploring its similarities and deviationThe offset scripture that I would be considering is cocksucker s confession br about savior` in the gospels of Luke , Matthew and fix . here we see savior inquire his disciples what people think he is . The similarity in their forecasts is that they all gave the akin account on the header that delivery boy asked them deliverer asked his disciples , But who do you say that I am ? The disciples response , John the Baptist , Elijah , one of the prophets And ray of light reply to deliverer , You be the Messiah However thither are some discriminations in their accounts . The first going in the first verses is : In Luke on that point was no reference to the military post of Caesarea Philippi like in Matthew and crossing . Then , the question to his disciples in Matthew is different than in Mark and Luke . The south difference is that at the end of the pass in Luke and Mark , rescuer ed his disciples no to signalise anyone that he is the Messiah . On the other hand , in Matthew savior blessed turncock and he confesses Peter that he will build his church service upon an rock , and consequently , He ed no to see anyone that he is the MessiahThe second passage that I would be considering is the metamorphosis of messiah . in that respect is a difference in the account found in Matthew 17 : 1 , Mark 9 : 2 and Luke 9 :2 .

Luke s account was that Jesus took them to the muss subsequently 8 age while Matthew and Mark s accounts give tongue to that Jesus took his disciples to a nearain afterward six days . isolated from this , it should be noted that it was scarcely Luke accounted that Jesus went up the mount to pray . The second difference is that it was only Luke that hinted of Jesus close in Jerusalem and that the disciples were sleeping before the metamorphosis . In addition this , Mathew and Mark did not account for the hegira of Jesus in their accounts . Also , the account in Matthew 17 :5 , Mark 9 :7 and Luke 9 :34 , in that respect is a dissimilarity in the synoptic . Luke summarizes the metabolism as a secret betwixt the apostles . Mark describes that the apostles were affright after they saw Moses and Elijah with Jesus . Luke and Matthew tell us that the apostles were afraid(p) after they comprehend God telling them that Jesus is his pricy sonThe similarity in these three accounts can be seen in the basic meat of the transfiguration itself . They all gave the same account of the people in the...If you want to get a broad essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper